Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Job openings Java 2-6 years of experience

If you know some one looking for job in this exp bracket then there are some openings in Hewitt(NCR).

If you want to send some one's resume the you can send it to me on tomar.sachin@gmail.com

Thursday, July 16, 2009

Sach ka Samna on Star Plus.

The show started airing on 15th July 2009 and like every one else, I also waited desperately for the show.
Thanks to the brilliant publicity gimmicks of Star Plus for the show in which they passed some information about the Vinod Kambley show to Times of India and they printed it promptly and then on the same evening Vinod Kambley kept roaming entire Mumbai giving explanation that he has not uttered any foul words against Sachin Tendulkar on the show.
It created huge curiosity and every one waited for the show to witness( they got really good publicity without spending too much on advertising of the show).
Let’s come to the show contents, It seems to be a promising show( matching to the original version “Moments of truth”).
Rajiv Khandelwal is really promising and I always wonder why is this guy wasting himself on TV after such a brilliant performance in movie Amir.
Whatever, The lady who got grilled on the first show( they call it speaking truth), I am sure will be regretting being on the show because the kind of questions which were fired on her can make any one uncomfortable in world( at least in India specially a female).
One definitely needs to have guts to face and answer such type of questions any way, because I personally assume that no one is so perfect that can answer truthfully on these question and still save his/her relationships in family/friends.
Specially the last question that “Would you ever sleep with some one else than your husband if your husband never comes to know about it “
Boy that is really hard because I am sure in a married life of years every one can definitely have some low moments of desires, so I assume every one will fail on this question if they say no and if they say yes then the next meeting of him/her with spouse will be in court room( for divorce of course:) )


I just wish that they allow some one bachelor on the show and then see what kind of blunt answers they get:)
Eagerly waiting for the next show tonight.

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Verdict for Mayavati

Now a days very one seems to be too annoyed with the extravagant nature of our beloved UP chief minister Mayavati, in getting her statues and elephants erected every where ( worth rs 1 crore each) .
I assume the she is trying to become immortal by these acts, just to leave a mark of her self in history.

People are filing petitions, Supreme Court getting angry, Chidambaram calling it a shame, I started thinking what should be the real punishment for her if court find her guilty ?

Well I got a very good idea suddenly, why don’t the election Commission of India change the polling symbol of Bahujan Samaj Party from elephant to some thing else, and on top of it give Elephant mark to Samajvadi Party, this way Mayavati will keep asking herself throughout the life that why did she spent so much on these elephants plus Mulayam Singh will also be happy that he got already established party symbol.
This way if Mayavati is CM of UP then she will not dare to spend so much money on the party symbol and if Mulayam Singh comes in to the power then again people will be saved from getting the money wasted because hiss party symbol is already erected there every where in UP.
Other wise I have started dreaming about statues of cycle erected all over UP( Cycle is Mulayam singh’s party symbol).
God saves UP

Friday, February 13, 2009

my daughter



My daughter, my centre of universe since last 6 months :)


My daughter, my centre of universe since last 6 months :)

Wednesday, February 4, 2009

Gandhi Family history

INTERESTING HISTORY!
This is not originally my blog but I read it some where and fount worthy enough to take space in my blog area, here it is.....
At the very beginning of his book, " The Nehru Dynasty", astrologer K.N.Rao
mentions the names of Jawaharlal's father and grandfather.
Jawahar Lal's father was believed to be Motilal and Motilal's father was one
Gangadhar Nehru.
And we all know that Jawaharlal's only daughter was Indira Priyadarshini Nehru;
Kamala Nehru was her mother, who died in Switzerland of tuberculosis.
She was totally against Indira's proposed marriage with Feroze.
Why? No one tells us that!
Now, who is this Feroze?
We are told by many that he was the son of thefamily grocer.
The grocer supplied wines,etc. to Anand Bhavan (previously known as Ishrat
Manzil)
What was the family grocer's name?
One frequently hears that Rajiv Gandhi's grandfather was Pandit Nehru.
But then we all know that everyone has two grandfathers, the paternal and the
maternal grandfathers.
In fact, the paternal grandfather is deemed to be the more important grandfather in
most societies.

Why is it then, no where, we find Rajiv Gandhi's paternal grandfather's name?
It appears that the reason is simply this. Rajiv Gandhi's paternal grandfather
was a Muslim gentleman from the Junagadh area of Gujarat.
This Muslim grocer by the name of Nawab Khan, had married a Parsi
woman after converting her to Islam.
This is the source where from the myth of Rajiv being a Parsi was derived.
Rajiv's father Feroze, was Feroze Khan before he married Indira, against
Kamala Nehru's wishes.
Feroze's mother's family name was Ghandy, often associated with Parsis
and this was changed to Gandhi,sometime before his wedding with Indira, by an
affidavit.
The fact of the matter isthat(and this fact can be found in many writings)
Indira was very lonely. Chased out of the Shantiniketan University by Guru Dev
Rabindranath himself for misdemeanor, the lonely girl was all by herself,
while father Jawahar was busy with politics, pretty women and illicit sex;
the mother was in hospital.
Feroze Khan, the grocer's son was then in England and he was quite
sympathetic to Indira and soon enough she changed her religion, became a
Muslim woman and married Feroze Khan in a London mosque.

Nehru was not happy; Kamala was dead already or dying. The news of this
marriage eventually reached Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi(better known as
Mahatma Gandhi).
Gandhi urgently called Nehru and practically ordered him to ask the young man
to change his name from Khan to Gandhi. It had nothing to do with change of
religion, from Islam to Hinduism for instance.
It was just a case of a change of name by an affidavit. And so Feroze Khan
became Feroze Gandhi.
The surprising thing is that the apostle of truth, the old man soon to be declared
India's Mahatma and the 'Father of the Nation' didn't mention this game of his in
the famous book, 'My Experiments with Truth'.Why?
When they returned to India, amock 'Vedic marriage' was instituted for public
consumption.
On this subject,writes M.O. Mathai (a longtime Private Secretary of Nehru) in his
renowned(but now suppressed by the GOI! )
'Reminiscences of the Nehru Age'on page94, second paragraph: "
For some inexplicable reason, Nehru allowed the marriage to be performed according to Vedic rites in 1942. An inter-religious and inter-caste marriage under Vedic rites at that time was not valid in law. To be legal, it had to be a civil marriage
."

It's a known fact that after Rajiv's birth Indira and Feroze lived separately,
butthey were not divorced.
Feroze used to harass Nehru frequently for money and also interfere in Nehru's
political activities. Nehru got fed up and left instructions not to allow him into the Prime Minister's residence Trimurthi Bhavan.
Mathai writes that the death of Feroze came as a relief to Nehru and Indira. The
death of Feroze in 1960 before he could consolidate his own political forces, is
itself a mystery. Feroze had even planned to remarry.
Those who try to keep tabs on our leaders in spite of all the suppressions and
deliberate misinformation, are aware of the fact that the second son of Indira (or
Mrs.Feroze Khan) known as Sanjay Gandhi was not the son of Feroze.
He was the son of another Muslim gentleman, Mohammad Yunus.
Here, in passing, we might mention that the second son was originally named
Sanjiv. It rhymed with Rajiv, the elder brother's name.
It was changed to Sanjay when he was arrested by the British police in England
and his passport impounded, for having stolen a car.
Krishna Menon was then India's High Commissioner in London. He offered to
issue another passport to the felon who changed his name to Sanjay.

Incidentally, Sanjay's marriage with the Sikh girl Menaka(now they call her
Maneka for Indira Gandhi found the name of mythological Lord Indra's Court
dancer rather offensive !!)
took place quite surprisingly in Mohammad Yunus's house in New Delhi.
And the marriage with Menaka who was a model(She had model for Bombay
Dyeing wearing just a towel)was not so ordinary either.
Sanjay was notorious in getting unwed young women pregnant. Menaka too was
rendered pregnant by Sanjay.
It was then that her father,Colonel Anand, threatened Sanjay with dire
consequences if he did not marry her daughter. And that did the trick.
Sanjay married Menaka. It was widely reported in Delhi at the time that
Mohammad Yunus was unhappy at the marriage of Sanjay with Menaka.
Apparently he had wanted to get him married with a Muslim girl of his choice.
It was Mohammad Yunus who cried the most when Sanjay died in the plane
accident.

In Yunus's book,'Persons, Passions & Politics'one discovers that baby
Sanjay had been circumcised following Islamic custom, although the
reason stated was phimosis.
It was always believed that Sanjay used to blackmail Indira Gandhi and
due to this she used to turn a blind eye when Sanjay Gandhi started to
run the country as though it were his personal freedom.
Was he black mailing her with the secret of who his real father was?
When the news of Sanjay's death reached Indira Gandhi, the first thing
she wanted to know was about the bunch of keys which Sanjay had with
him.

Nehru was no less a player in producing bastards.At least one case is very graphically described by M.O. Mathai in his" Reminiscences of the NehruAge
", page 206.
Mathai writes:
"In the autumn of 1948 a young woman from Benares arrived in New
Delhi as a sanyasini named Shraddha Mata (an assumed and not a real
name). She was a Sanskrit scholar well versed in the ancient Indian
scriptures and mythology. People, including MPs, thronged to her to hear
her discourses. One day S.D. Upadhyaya, Nehru's old employee, brought
a letter in Hindi from Shraddha Mata. Nehru gave her an interview in the
PM's house. As she departed, I noticed(Mathai is speaking here)
thatshe was young, shapely and beautiful. Meetings of Nehru with her
became rather frequent, mostly after he finished his work at night. During
one of Nehru's visits to Lucknow, Shraddha Mata turned up there and
Upadhyaya brought a letter from her as usual. Nehru sent her the reply
and she visited Nehru at midnight...“
Suddenly Shraddha Mata disappeared.
In November 1949 a convent in Bangalore sent a decent looking person to
Delhi with a bundle of letters. He said that a young woman from northern
India arrived at the convent a few months ago and gave birth to a baby
boy. She refused to divulge her name or give any particulars about herself.
She left the convent as soon as she was well enough to move out but left
the child behind.
She however forgot to take with her a small cloth bundle in which, among
other things, several letters in Hindi were found. The Mother Superior, who
was a foreigner, had the letters examined and was told they were from the
Prime Minister.
The person who brought the letters surrendered them..."I (Mathai) made
discreet inquiries repeatedly about the boy but failed to get a clue about his
hereabouts. Convents in such matters are extremely tightlipped and
secretive.
Had I succeeded in locating the boy, I would have adopted him. He must
have grown up as a Catholic Christian blissfully ignorant of who his father
was."

Coming back to Rajiv Gandhi,we all know now that he changed his so called Parsi religion to become a Catholic to marry Sania Maino of Turin, Italy.Rajiv became Roberto.
His daughter's name is Bianca and son's name is Raul.
Quite cleverly the same names are presented to the people of India as Priyanka
and Rahul.
What is amazing is the extent of our people's ignorance in such matters.
The press conference that Rajiv Gandhi gave in London after taking over as
Prime minister of India was very informative. In this press conference, Rajiv
boasted that he was NOT a Hindu but a Parsi.
Mind you, speaking of the Parsi religion,he had no Parsi ancestor at all.
His grandmother (father's mother) had turned Muslim after having abandoned the
Parsi religion to marry Nawab Khan.

It is the western press that waged a blitz of misinformation on behalf of Rajiv.
From the New York Times to the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post,
the big guns raised Rajiv to heaven.
The children's encyclopedias recorded that Rajiv was a qualified Mechanical
Engineer from the revered University of Cambridge.
No doubt US kids areamong the most misinformed in the world today!
The reality is that in all three years of his tenure at that University Rajiv had not passed a single exam. He had therefore to leave Cambridge without a
certificate.
Sonia too had the same benevolent treatment. She was stated to be a student
in Cambridge. Such a description is calculated to mislead Indians.
She was a student in Cambridge all right,but not of the University of Cambridge
, but of one of those fly by night language schools where foreign students come to
learn English. Sonia was working as an 'au pair' girl in Cambridge and trying to
learn English at the same time.
And surprise of surprises, Rajiv was even cremated as per Vedic rites in full
view of India's public.

This is the Nehru dynasty that India worships and now a foreigner leads a prestigious national party because of just one qualification being married into
the Nehru family.
Maneka Gandhi, though Indian, herself is being accepted by the non-Congress parties
not because she was a former model or an animal lover, but for her links to the Nehru family.
Saying that an Italian (or any foreigner)should not lead India will amount to narrow mindedness,but if Sania Maino (now Sonia) had served India like, say,Mother Teresa or Annie Besant,i.e. in anyway on her own rights, then all Indians should be proud of her just as how proud we are of Mother Teresa.
OR
Saying that any other party which comes to rule India is better is again equally
worse.The point is Indians who nominate the people to stand in these elections; and
truth the people who vote their rulers (i.e. the authorities) must know that eventually come out some day.

Dont allow the famous land of India (our motherland) to be looked down
by others.


Spare a moment and check the background of each nominee.
A good-well nourished tree
always
bear good fruit.
You are responsible too.

Monday, December 15, 2008

Loyalty is Helplessness,Indian Managers think so

I have been thinking and discussing some sudden changes in my company in very recent time when a big player of the same domain entered in Indian market and swept away a big chunk of the human talent, my company possesses (or rather used to posses).

If one wishes to stay in a company for a longer period then should it be considered like, is the employee loyal or helpless and can’t move into some new company?

Most of the people I know, zeroed in on the later point (helpless), or they decided that at least all the managers think so.

Recently I have seen what a complacent and ignorant management can do to company when people starts running out as soon as there is an opportunity, and in most of the cases these are the same people who have been with the company for a long time, because they are perceived as helpless bunch of people who can not find any new job and should not be under any retention plan.

I had words with so many people who left recently and most of them have one concern that they felt ignored by the managers despite of serving for so many years in the company, because managers have one simple approach that if some one is not leaving the organization even after few years (3 years as standard in Indian context) then he has to be helpless and not loyal.

One bad impact of this approach is that even I who never felt like leaving my current company so far has started thinking seriously about changing J

One more thing why managers always start admiring someone after he puts up the paper and not before that?

It simply instill the feeling into every one that to be worthy enough one has to resign first J

In the end if you don’t want to sound helpless then the very first thing you should do keep changing the job after every few years (3 years max again) else get ready to feel ignored J